Monday, May 06, 2013

First I've heard of this -

Last week, on the 25th April 2013, the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill was granted royal assent, bringing into law the government’s widely unpopular proposals to scrap employers’ 114-year-old liability for their staff’s health and safety in the workplace.
This means that the burden of proof now falls on the employee to show that the employer had been negligent in their duties towards them, rather than the employer being asked to prove they were following regulations correctly, as has been the case since the Victorian era. This is likely to result in injured workers, and the families of the deceased, being unable to claim compensation for their losses due to accidents at the workplace, seeing as the evidence needed to prove negligence is held by the employer rather than the employee – and employers guilty of negligence are unlikely to willingly hand over the proof.

Not reported by the BBC (surprise, surprise!), but who in a position of influence gives a fiddler's fart about the working clss today? Who in the mainstream media acknowledges the existence of such a class? We are the underclass, but not yet far enough under to suit the accessories to depradation running the British economy (into the ground).

No comments: